<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 acura tl type-s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/</link>
	<description>Taking the internet out into the street and kicking it in the brains since twenty cero to tha four</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smoove D</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-29020</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoove D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-29020</guid>
		<description>You should try searching "Atlanta Sucks"  - I'm top five on that one.

I assume the regular TL will remain at 258 horses.  I doubt Acura would increase it much if they want to sell any Type-S sedans.

I think the car is a sorry fucking excuse for a Type-S.  Like Seth mentioned above, a RWD turbocharged Type-S with over 350 whp would have owned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should try searching &#8220;Atlanta Sucks&#8221;  - I&#8217;m top five on that one.</p>
<p>I assume the regular TL will remain at 258 horses.  I doubt Acura would increase it much if they want to sell any Type-S sedans.</p>
<p>I think the car is a sorry fucking excuse for a Type-S.  Like Seth mentioned above, a RWD turbocharged Type-S with over 350 whp would have owned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-29019</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-29019</guid>
		<description>Smoove, baby ... you rank high for a "2007 Acura TL type s" search. So the 286 horses ain't more than the regular TL will be? 

Starting to like that TSX a bit. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoove, baby &#8230; you rank high for a &#8220;2007 Acura TL type s&#8221; search. So the 286 horses ain&#8217;t more than the regular TL will be? </p>
<p>Starting to like that TSX a bit. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-28938</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-28938</guid>
		<description>Sad day indeed when the 2007 MDX (300HP) will outpower a TL Type-S.  Between this TL debacle, dismal sales of the RL and burying the RSX, it seems like Acura has lost touch with their customer base.

I need a new sedan, but think Iâ€™m better off going with a early 2000s M5 rather than dealing with what Japan is offering these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad day indeed when the 2007 MDX (300HP) will outpower a TL Type-S.  Between this TL debacle, dismal sales of the RL and burying the RSX, it seems like Acura has lost touch with their customer base.</p>
<p>I need a new sedan, but think Iâ€™m better off going with a early 2000s M5 rather than dealing with what Japan is offering these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-28876</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-28876</guid>
		<description>That sucks Smoove. It hurts when your  company turns it back on you.

A Turbo RWD luxury sports Acura would've been awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sucks Smoove. It hurts when your  company turns it back on you.</p>
<p>A Turbo RWD luxury sports Acura would&#8217;ve been awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoove D</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-28873</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoove D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-28873</guid>
		<description>Essentially yes, but I don't think the Type-S has the ASPEC suspension parts.  I may be wrong though, there isn't a ton of information out yet.  Therin lies the rub - they didn't get it up over 300hp, it only has a paltry 286.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essentially yes, but I don&#8217;t think the Type-S has the ASPEC suspension parts.  I may be wrong though, there isn&#8217;t a ton of information out yet.  Therin lies the rub - they didn&#8217;t get it up over 300hp, it only has a paltry 286.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManNMotion</title>
		<link>http://www.propellerskies.com/2006/08/2007-acura-tl-type-s/#comment-28872</link>
		<dc:creator>ManNMotion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=562#comment-28872</guid>
		<description>So what's the S?  Is that like a A-SPEC with all the cosmetic enhancements and and anti sway bar?  The car already has something like 270 hp, but if it's an S they need to put a turbo on it or something to get it up to over 300.  When BMW puts the M on something it means something. First, it means way better performance.  Second, it means more time in the shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the S?  Is that like a A-SPEC with all the cosmetic enhancements and and anti sway bar?  The car already has something like 270 hp, but if it&#8217;s an S they need to put a turbo on it or something to get it up to over 300.  When BMW puts the M on something it means something. First, it means way better performance.  Second, it means more time in the shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

