Another railroad performance measure I follow is average train speed. This measure, speed, is a pain in my fucking ass. Because financial disclosure regulations do not require it, railroads report speed whenever the fuck they feel like it or, in the case of Canadian National (CNI), almost never. However, reporting has improved recently and railroad performance measures are updated weekly except for CNI.

Despite the lack of reporting, average train speed is a very useful performance measure to track. Basically, faster trains allow railroads to haul more shit with less cars and fewer locomotives. Since freight cars and locomotives cost a fuckton of money, and hauling stuff is how railroads generate revenue, less capital equipment plus more stuff delivered equals higher profits.

The first conclusion that can be drawn from the above table is only half the major North American railroads provide average velocity on a regular basis. From the limited data available, all three railroads managed a year over year improvement in average train speed. However, only Canadian Pacific (CP) had an average speed above the five year average. CSX and Union Pacific (UNP) both had slower average train velocities in 2006 compared to their 2001 - 2005 average. Alert readers will recall that CSX and UNP also had the highest operating ratios during 2006.

Speaking of alert readers, if anyone out there on the internet could hook a cracka up with sources of historical speed data for the missing railroads, I would be most appreciative. Average dwell time would be nice, too.

Average train velocity is merely one performance measure. See the next post in this series: Free Cash Flow or previous posts in the series - Railroad Performance Measures: Yield and Railroad Performance Measures: Operating Ratio at the beginning.

notes:

Useful links regarding performance measures:

• Canadian Pacific AAR Reports
• Union Pacific AAR and STB Reports
• Railroad Performance Measures - does not include CNI.